Skip to main content

Member Reviews

This was my 10th John Irving book. Like the previous nine, it's full of creative rambling. The characters spiderweb from subject to subject at any time and place. Part of their charm is their stream-of-consciousness dialog.

That said, "Queen Esther" is more disjointed than other Irving books I've read and enjoyed. It seemed long and ponderous.

Three stars is the best I can do.

Was this review helpful?

John Irving is a wonderful story teller. So, I was really looking forward to reading this book. For me, the book fell flat and after 3 chapters unfortunately, I gave up.
Thank you #NetGalley, #Simon&Schuster, #JohnIrving and #QueenEsther for the ebook for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

So disappointing! I've been a huge Irving fan since Garp hit the shelves (and in which the author mentions my family). But "Queen Esther", in my opinion, was nothing but a (very) thinly veiled autobiography, and a soapbox from which the author assails the reader with his views on politics, religion, abortion, anti-semitism, and sexuality, among others. It was more of a diatribe than a story.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for an advance copy in exchange of an honest review. I've never read John Irving before, so came to this book with no expectations. But I found the narrative plodding, the characters a bit annoying, and gave up halfway through. The cover art enchanted me, and I hoped the story would be more about a young Jewish orphan and the small-town community she finds herself in, but there was none of that. Esther is introduced to us at age four, then jumps to near adulthood. Some witty repartee (some quite funny) but long sections of uninteresting exposition left me impatient to get to the story. Maybe this one is for Irving fans, but unfortunately not for me.

Was this review helpful?

I don't know what to say about this one. It's beautifully written of course and I really loved some of the characters but there is too much this book is trying to say about so many different topics that it feel flat for me.

Was this review helpful?

Esther Nacht is a Viennese Jew brought to a small New Hampshire town to nanny the youngest daughter of Thomas and Constance Winslow. Esther is adopted by the Winslows and becomes the birth mother of this same daughter, Honor Winslow's son James.
James, or Jimmy as he is generally known, is a complex character: he loves wrestling like his biological father, and old English novels like his grandfather Winslow. Jimmy also agonized over his Jewish background, and how he fits into the New Hampshire area, and later in Vienna, Austria with his college contemporaries. Irving's concentration on sex, penises and other scatological elements tends to detract from the messages in the book.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and Simon & Schuster for an ARC of this book. 3.5 ⭐️ (rounded up because Irving is one of my favorite authors of all time)

I was excited and delighted when I heard John Irving had a new novel coming out and I was thrilled to be selected to read a review copy. Irving is one of my all-time favorite authors and I have read all his books. Fans of Irving will feel the lovely familiarity of many common themes of his books - wrestling, a New England boys’ boarding school, a diminutive English teacher, a sprawling family history, a visit to Vienna, a main character who is a writer, the Vietnam War, and the integration of LGBTQ characters without much fanfare. And, of course, this book builds upon The Cider House Rules (Irving’s “abortion” novel). Reading Irving is like catching up with an old friend.

Queen Esther did feel like it dragged a bit in places and missed some of the Irving sparkle. Too much was familiar and not much was new. I doubt this is a symptom of Irving’s age or how prolific he has been. Indeed, the novel published before this one, The Last Chairlift, included all the familiar characteristics of Irving’s previous novels and the plot felt fresh, new, and exciting. This book felt a bit like Irving wanted to write a book that addresses antisemitism and shoehorned a novel, including already beloved characters, around his message.

You do not need to have read The Cider House Rules to understand Queen Esther. It is not a sequel.

If you are a John Irving fan, I would recommend this book. Not every book is a favorite and Queen Esther is worth the read. If you are new to Irving, I would start with his older books (A Prayer for Owen Meany, The World According to Garp, The Cider House Rules, The Hotel New Hampshire). If you have read some of his older works and want a newer novel, I would recommend “In One Body” and “The Last Chairlift.” I, myself, am a completionist and Queen Esther is far from my least favorite of Irving’s novels. It is a solid B and when so many other books of his are A’s…

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley and the publishers for the advanced copy of this book. It's been YEARS since I've read an Irving novel and unfortunately this was my least favorite. In Irving's tradition, this novel is long and contains a lot of strange, irrelevant storylines. Ironically, the strange sections were the BEST part and the only sections that held my interest and kept me going. I loved and appreciated the ending as well.

Was this review helpful?

John Irving writes instant contemporary classics, and this book is no different. He had proven himself time and time again, and I think it's time I read through his catalog in whole!

Was this review helpful?

I received a copy of the book,"Queen Esther" by John Irving from NetGalley. I had my hopes up for this book when I read that Esther had been at the orphanage from Cider House Rules. I had hoped some of the book would be about her stay there. It turned out Esther is not in the book very much. She had been "adopted' by a well to do family when she was 15 with then intention of being a nanny to their about to be born daughter Honor. the part of Esther goes very quickly she leaves the home after raising Honor. Most of the book is surrounded by Jimmy, the baby Esther gives birth to and hands him to the now grown Honor to raise. it focuses on Jimmy growing up with is very protective mom Honor.
Jimmy is an okay character he grows up in a well to do home. wants to become a writer thanks to a grandfather who taught him to love books especially Charles Dickens. Jim's mother does everything she can to protect him from being drafted in the Vietnam war. the book follows his years in Europe. the book mentions Esther here and there but not too much is written about Esther until the very end. many characters are not likeable. my favorite character was "Hard Rain" the dog. wished I could have liked this book better.

Was this review helpful?

If you are a fan of John Irving’s Cider House Rules his
latest book, Queen Esther, is a must read. If you are not familiar with Cider House Rules, Queen Esther is still a must read….it stands alone as a brilliant story of historical and literary fiction. It also is laced with familiarity from Irving’s previous works of art, most notably Cider House. A lot can happen in one lifetime, and Esther’s life is a grand example of this. Her journey is one of triumph, courage and perseverance. Her story should not be missed.

Was this review helpful?

I love everything by John Irving, but tthis one just did not hit the spot. I can't really write a review, because I only read 2 chapters before I gave up. I could not follow or find interest in the story.

Was this review helpful?

I am not sure why this book exists.

Although it takes place in the same universe as "The Cider House Rules," it's not really a sequel. The orphanage at St. Cloud's that provides much of the setting of TCHR is part of our titular character's origin story, but we quickly move on.

Those familiar with Irving's work will find the same touchstones: New England prep schools, wrestling, single mothers, nurses, writers, etc. What Irving does, he does well, and this novel is no exception. What I find confusing is why he attempts to untangle the question of what it means to be Jewish, Zionism, Israeli history, etc. It's not part of his usual bag of goods, and it's such a complicated subject that often seems out of place here. The novel is a hodgepodge of ideas. We spent multiple chapters analyzing Dickens, "The Great Expectations" in particular. We discuss the merits of circumcision at length. It makes for a choppy narrative until James Winslow, our protagonist, studies abroad in Vienna for the year.

The chapters in Vienna are where the novel comes alive. Until then, it feels aimless. Esther Nacht is such a mythical character that most of the time we hear her thoughts transcribed by others and not straight from the source. Almost her entire story is narrated by others, which is obviously by design, but it puts the reader at a distance. I wonder when Irving began this work, or when he first came up with the idea, for naming your novel after a character who is an IDF soldier says a lot in 2025. I'm not sure he's the person to tell this part of the story.

"The Cider House Rules" was about how those in power (often, men) make laws that govern others (namely, women) who have no say in the matter. This narrative, with the overturning of Roe vs. Wade, is just as timely today, so it would have made sense to return to that theme. Instead we have a story whose aim seems unclear.

Was this review helpful?

John Irving is one of the great talents. I fell in love with Owen Meany and had expected a similar moving exploration. Although multiple plots felt tedious to follow, the writing and humor kept the story alive. Not my favorite Irving book, but does that even matter? He's a brilliant storyteller and I'll always be a fan. 3.75 rounded up.

Was this review helpful?

I don't know what to say about this one. It's beautifully written of course and I really loved some of the characters but their is too much this book is trying to say about so many different topics that it feel flat for me. I wish this book could have a do over.

Was this review helpful?

I was so looking forward to another compelling read by John Irving, and was so disappointed in Queen Esther. At 50%, I gave up. The "story" meanders around and I couldn't really tell if it was going anywhere. There's A LOT of background information that should have been omitted, in my opinion. I'm not sure it added to the progression of the story, but it did slow it down uncomfortably. I just couldn't get through it.

Thank you to NetGalley for allowing me to read and review Queen Esther.

Was this review helpful?

I’m sorry to say that I think it may be time for Mr. Irving to set down his pen, which I thought he was rumored to do after his last extremely long and in my opinion, indulgent, novel, The Last Chairlift. This book was similarly lengthy and tangential, so much so, that I DNFed at 29% after trying to pick it back up several times. There were a few glimpses of his talent and humor as he developed a couple of characters, but it was all lost in the monotony of unnecessary plot details. I’d leave this one on the shelf, and reread his classics, The Cider House Rules and A Prayer For Owen Meany.

Thank you very much to NetGalley and Simon and Schuster for the advanced reader’s copy of this book in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

I tried to hard to like this book and I did enjoy the convoluted story and relatable characters but honestly it felt like it needed so much editing. So many pieces of story that were lengthy and held little apparent content. Some were more interesting to me than others, but some were complete slogs. I got to about 60% and just can't get myself to finish it -- which is too bad as I know Irving often wraps things up in spectacular ways. I was so interesting in all of the Jewish themes -- especially now -- but I got too bogged down in Germany which was unpleasant and dull. Sorry!

Was this review helpful?

3.9. I like John Irving’s work, particularly A Prayer for Owen Meany, The World According to Garp and The Cider House Rules, so was looking forward to reading his newest novel, Queen Esther. It had an interesting premise: a teacher and his family took in orphaned young women to be nannies to their four daughters, but it was the last one, Esther, a young Jewish woman, that seems to be one of the main characters and her impact on the family, particularly the youngest who she took care of, Honor. The novel follows the family, including Honor, and Honor’s son, Jimmy for several decades. It has many of the themes of Irving’s work, taking place at a school in New Hampshire, orphanages, and wrestling, but this one also focuses on survival, identity, religion and family relationships. I liked it but didn’t love it. I had difficulty staying engaged in parts as I thought tried to cover too much and therefore may have diminished its overall impact. The characters, though, are generally well developed. And as with many of his novels, there were parts that made me laugh out loud. Thank you to Netgalley for providing me an advance copy in exchange for an unbiased and candid review.

Was this review helpful?

I know John Irving books are long tales and I'm not that far into Queen Esther yet, but I'm also not sure I have the bandwidth to continue. It hasn't captured my imagination yet, Most likely for steadfast fans of Mr. Irving's previous books. Well written but not as engaging as I had hoped.

Was this review helpful?