William Faulkner in Hollywood

Screenwriting for the Studios

This title was previously available on NetGalley and is now archived.
Buy on Amazon Buy on BN.com Buy on Bookshop.org
*This page contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you.
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app

1
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Pub Date 01 Aug 2017 | Archive Date 31 Jul 2017

Description

During more than two decades (1932–1954), William Faulkner worked on approximately fifty screenplays for studios, including MGM, 20th Century–Fox, and Warner Bros., and was credited on such classic films as The Big Sleep and To Have and Have Not. The scripts that Faulkner wrote for film—and, later on, television—constitute an extensive and, until now, thoroughly underexplored archival source. Stefan Solomon not only analyzes the majority of these scripts but compares them to the novels and short stories Faulkner was writing at the same time. Solomon’s aim is to reconcile two aspects of a career that were not as distinct as they first might seem: Faulkner as a screenwriter and Faulkner as a high modernist, Nobel Prize–winning author.

Faulkner’s Hollywood sojourns took place during a period roughly bounded by the publication of Light in August (1932) and A Fable (1954) and that also saw the publication of Absalom, Absalom!; Go Down, Moses; and Intruder in the Dust. As Solomon shows Faulkner attuning himself to the idiosyncrasies of the screen­writing process (a craft he never favored or admired), he offers insights into Faulkner’s compositional practice, thematic preoccupations, and understanding of both classic cinema and the emerging medium of television. In the midst of this complex exchange of media and genres, much of Faulkner’s fiction of the 1930s and 1940s was directly influenced by his protracted engagement with the film industry.

Solomon helps us to see a corpus integrating two vastly different modes of writing and a restless author, sensitive to the different demands of each. Faulkner was never simply the southern novelist or the West Coast “hack writer” but always both at once. Solomon’s study shows that Faulkner’s screenplays are crucial in any consideration of his far more esteemed fiction—and that the two forms of writing are more porous and intertwined than the author himself would have us believe. Here is a major American writer seen in a remarkably new way.

During more than two decades (1932–1954), William Faulkner worked on approximately fifty screenplays for studios, including MGM, 20th Century–Fox, and Warner Bros., and was credited on such classic...


A Note From the Publisher

Stefan Solomon is a postdoctoral researcher in lm at the University of Reading. He is coeditor, with Julian Murphet, of William Faulkner in the Media Ecology. Part of the South on Screen series.

Stefan Solomon is a postdoctoral researcher in lm at the University of Reading. He is coeditor, with Julian Murphet, of William Faulkner in the Media Ecology. Part of the South on Screen series.


Available Editions

EDITION Other Format
ISBN 9780820351131
PRICE $49.95 (USD)
PAGES 320

Average rating from 5 members


Featured Reviews

Many artists have been accused of selling out at some stage in their careers, whether it’s Dylan going electric or Johnny Rotten flogging Country Life butter.

Filthy lucre lured many major writers to Hollywood in its golden age, including Dorothy Parker, F. Scott Fitzgerald, S. J. Perelman, Nathanael West, John Steinbeck, Anthony Powell, Aldous Huxley and William Faulkner.

Between 1932 and 1955 Faulkner spent a total of four years working in Hollywood and notwithstanding some friendships, most notably with Howard Hawks, and an affair with Hawk’s script clerk, Meta Carpenter, Faulkner hated the place: “Nothing ever happens’, he wrote, “I don’t like the climate, the people, the way they live.” Not least amongst the reasons for Faulkner’s hostility to Tinseltown was his feeling that he'd not only sold out in producing “trash and junk writing for movies” but had also done so for less than the market rate - he certainly seems to have driven a bad bargain with the studios compared with most of his peers.

Stefan Solomon’s ‘William Faulkner in Hollywood’ examines the novelist’s screenwriting for the big screen and television and certainly makes a good case for the thesis that Faulkner’s ‘hack’ work, for all its particular demands and frustrations, sheds important light on his more ‘serious’ work, given factors such as their shared thematic preoccupations.

Although Solomon generally seems to have been exceptionally diligent in combing the archives and the secondary literature, he appears to be unaware, judging by his bibliography, not only of Richard Gray’s 1994 biography of Faulkner but also of Gray’s very germane lecture on Faulkner and Hollywood which was published in Volume 131 of the ‘Proceedings of the British Academy’ in 2004. This publication not only pays particular attention to Faulkner’s film treatment of ‘Sanctuary’ (the success of which as a novel had originally led to his being summoned by MGM) but also discusses Faulkner’s relationship with “noir narrative”, which characterised so much of the fiction of the 1930s and 1940s, and which later seeped into film noir, through films such as ‘The Big Sleep’ and ‘To Have and Have Not’, which are amongst Faulkner's screenwriting credits.

Even those unwilling to overlook this oversight and Solomon’s omission of a formal conclusion would, however, have to admit that ‘William Faulkner in Hollywood’ represents a very valuable addition to Faulkner studies.

Was this review helpful?
Not set

Stefan Solomon takes us on a wonderfully researched journey through approx 2 decades of the accomplished writers life whilst comparing his body of work. From his film and tv scripts which he didn't love doing, to his totally different work on his Nobel Prize winning novels. Analysis is also given on the differences of his scripts and short stories written at the same time. An enjoyable new book that shows a previously unseen side to a great American storyteller.

Not set
Was this review helpful?

William Faulkner was different from literary greats like F. Scott Fitzgerald and John Steinbeck who came to Hollywood chasing a big paycheck and then struggled to adapt. The novelist not only adjusted well to studio life, but thrived. In a new book, Stefan Solomon examines Faulkner's Hollywood experience and how it colored his creative output.

While Faulkner's time writing screenplays took him away from more personally satisfying literary pursuits, it also gave him the financial resources to continue that work, in addition to providing inspiration for its development. His practicality on that front, and his adaptability and ability to understand the demands of cinema worked enormously to his benefit. He was able to write in the style of different studios, finding success at RKO, MGM and Warner Bros, collaborating on fixing and conceiving projects, looking upon the whole enterprise as a job, though it was not without its artistic inspirations.

In fact, the inspiration ran two ways when it came to Faulkner's writing during his Hollywood years. The rich world of his literature colored his screenplays and sometimes that day work inspired his novel writing in the early morning hours, before he headed to the studio. Hollywood was never the dream. Faulkner always preferred his Mississippi home, but the writer embraced the opportunities movie money offered while reaping those creative benefits.

Faulkner was unusual among novelists in his grasp of the visual and aural language of movie writing. He was adept at integrating stage direction and sound into his scripts, creating a world to accompany his dialogue. On the other hand, the power of dialogue impressed itself upon the novelist, and he would begin to insert more of it in his literary works.

As a script fixer, Faulkner had a knack for adding dramatic tension, pumping life into literary sources so that they could live on the screen. He understood the needs of the cinematic form as well as he did their differences from literature. For example, director Jean Renoir felt Faulkner's small, but significant contributions to the script of The Southerner (1945) helped to translate its literary source to the screen. When the writer created a scene about competition over catching a desired fish, it both added dramatic tension and resolved an important plot thread.

The book examines both Faulkner's credited and uncredited work, demonstrating how, as with the Renoir film, the writer could significantly affect a movie with as little as a single scene or a few lines of dialogue. These efforts include work on films as diverse as Gunga Din (1939), Mildred Pierce (1945), The Big Sleep (1946) and Drums Along the Mohawk (1939). It is interesting to note that while Faulkner was more often contributor than lead, he tended to work on films that would become classics.

This is a highly accessible academic work, appropriate for the casual reader. It goes deep into the details, and reader interest will depend on whether or not that kind of analysis is appealing. The focus is on craft, with very little personal detail. Faulkner's methods and the way he navigated Hollywood take center stage.

Perhaps William Faulkner belonged in Mississippi, writing novels and eating watermelon on his back porch, but he made the most of his time in Hollywood. William Faulkner in Hollywood captures the unusual combination of vision, industry and practicality that made that so.

Was this review helpful?

Readers who liked this book also liked: