*This page contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you.
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Talking about this book? Use #TheMillionDeadTooSummdUp #NetGalley. More hashtag tips!
Description
This book is the first to offer a comprehensive selection of Walt Whitman’s Civil War poetry and prose with a full commentary on each work. Ed Folsom and Christopher Merrill carry on a dialogue with Whitman (and with each other) as they invite readers to trace how Whitman’s writing about the Civil War develops, shifts, and manifests itself in different genres throughout the years of the war. The book offers forty selections of Whitman’s war writings, including not only the well-known war poems but also his prose and personal letters. Each are followed by Folsom’s critical examination and then by Merrill’s afterword, suggesting broader contexts for thinking about the selection.
The real democratic reader, Whitman said, “must himself or herself construct indeed the poem, argument, history, metaphysical essay—the text furnishing the hints, the clue, the start or frame-work,” because what is needed for democracy to flourish is “a nation of supple and athletic minds.” Folsom and Merrill model this kind of active reading and encourage both seasoned and new readers of Whitman’s war writings to enter into the challenging and exhilarating mode of talking back to Whitman, arguing with him, and learning from him.
This book is the first to offer a comprehensive selection of Walt Whitman’s Civil War poetry and prose with a full commentary on each work. Ed Folsom and Christopher Merrill carry on a dialogue with...
This book is the first to offer a comprehensive selection of Walt Whitman’s Civil War poetry and prose with a full commentary on each work. Ed Folsom and Christopher Merrill carry on a dialogue with Whitman (and with each other) as they invite readers to trace how Whitman’s writing about the Civil War develops, shifts, and manifests itself in different genres throughout the years of the war. The book offers forty selections of Whitman’s war writings, including not only the well-known war poems but also his prose and personal letters. Each are followed by Folsom’s critical examination and then by Merrill’s afterword, suggesting broader contexts for thinking about the selection.
The real democratic reader, Whitman said, “must himself or herself construct indeed the poem, argument, history, metaphysical essay—the text furnishing the hints, the clue, the start or frame-work,” because what is needed for democracy to flourish is “a nation of supple and athletic minds.” Folsom and Merrill model this kind of active reading and encourage both seasoned and new readers of Whitman’s war writings to enter into the challenging and exhilarating mode of talking back to Whitman, arguing with him, and learning from him.
I don't know which I liked more, the actual words of Whitman or the commentary by Folsom and Merill. In both you may find deficiencies and elements you wish were not there, but its hard not to find this book entertaining and enlightening. I highly recommend it.
What could possibly be the deficiencies, if I highly recommend it? Well, to put the matter succinctly, the whole project of writer and commentator borders on the personal. Whitman's experience of the war was a very deeply engaging experience. He was in the thick of the war seeing injuries in the hospitals and knowing personally so many combatants. The million dead is not an exaggeration, and Whitman is knee deep in the blood of a land killing itself in barbarism and heroism. He must try to make sense of the grandeur and senselessness. He fails, a lot. But that's part of the glory of Whitman, he keeps going and battles through to give us a clarity and comprehensiveness of the conflict that you will not walk away from unaffected.
Similarly, the commentators draw examples from what some may consider a narrow vantage point of today's conflicts and their own experiences. But that is part of the nature of Whitman, he invokes a personal reaction. That you might see the work differently than the commentators does not diminish the power and truth of their comments. All in all, its well done, and for the work of Whitman and his commentators, there must always remain an incompleteness. What is needed is the reader to engage themselves. If anything, Whitman says to the reader that they matter. You add something to Whitman, you engage his words as if it were a conversation with a man that has something important to say, and something you have to hear.
Was this review helpful?
Featured Reviews
Willy M, Reviewer
I don't know which I liked more, the actual words of Whitman or the commentary by Folsom and Merill. In both you may find deficiencies and elements you wish were not there, but its hard not to find this book entertaining and enlightening. I highly recommend it.
What could possibly be the deficiencies, if I highly recommend it? Well, to put the matter succinctly, the whole project of writer and commentator borders on the personal. Whitman's experience of the war was a very deeply engaging experience. He was in the thick of the war seeing injuries in the hospitals and knowing personally so many combatants. The million dead is not an exaggeration, and Whitman is knee deep in the blood of a land killing itself in barbarism and heroism. He must try to make sense of the grandeur and senselessness. He fails, a lot. But that's part of the glory of Whitman, he keeps going and battles through to give us a clarity and comprehensiveness of the conflict that you will not walk away from unaffected.
Similarly, the commentators draw examples from what some may consider a narrow vantage point of today's conflicts and their own experiences. But that is part of the nature of Whitman, he invokes a personal reaction. That you might see the work differently than the commentators does not diminish the power and truth of their comments. All in all, its well done, and for the work of Whitman and his commentators, there must always remain an incompleteness. What is needed is the reader to engage themselves. If anything, Whitman says to the reader that they matter. You add something to Whitman, you engage his words as if it were a conversation with a man that has something important to say, and something you have to hear.
The Light Pirate
Lily Brooks-Dalton
General Fiction (Adult), LGBTQIAP+, Literary Fiction
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use the site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. You'll also find information about how we protect your personal data in our privacy policy.