To a High Court

Five Bold Law Students Challenge Corporate Greed and Change the Law

This title was previously available on NetGalley and is now archived.
Buy on Amazon Buy on BN.com Buy on Bookshop.org
*This page contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you.
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app

1
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Pub Date 14 Apr 2023 | Archive Date 16 Jun 2023

Talking about this book? Use #ToaHighCourt #NetGalley. More hashtag tips!


Description

It is the fall of 1971. Richard Nixon is in the White House. The nation is still in turmoil over the war in Vietnam. The national dissonance has preoccupied Congress; not only the war but also the need to recognize new values through law: dislodging corporate comfort before regulatory agencies, protecting consumers, enhancing the environment, and protecting the public’s health. 

At George Washington University, five law students sign up for a course that allows involvement with a real-life project they determine in lieu of a final exam. They start a group project targeting the corporate greed of the nation’s railroads, and the failure of the government to protect the environment and challenge the nation’s oldest regulatory agency, the Interstate Commerce Commission. They want compliance with a new law – the National Environmental Policy Act – and its application to freight rates, asserting that the nation's railroads discouraged the collection and use of recyclable materials and encouraged the unnecessary mining and exploitation of natural resources.

The group’s name: Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, or SCRAP, and in the Spring 1972, long after the course ended and after eight months of battle before the Commission, they sued the United States. As success emerged, their adversaries stymied, the critical legal question remained: Does SCRAP have “standing to sue,” or the right to be in court at all? That question reached the United States Supreme Court. In To a High Court: Five Bold Law Students Challenge Corporate Greed and Change the Law (50th Anniversary Edition, April 2023), Neil Thomas Proto, then SCRAP’s chair, provides a gripping, first-person account of when he and his classmates dared to take on one of the most powerful industries in America, as well as the federal government, and won one of the most expansive decisions on standing in Supreme Court history.

Proto builds a narrative with photographs and actual dialogue to take readers through their battle against the government, powerful law firms, the nation’s railroads, and national environmental organizations – all while SCRAP’s members are studying law, only blocks from the unsettledness in the White House and amid the threat and reality of anti-war demonstrations. Using excerpts from court transcripts, as well as the papers of Justices Douglas, Marshall, and Blackmun, Proto details the roadblocks, in law and in culture, SCRAP encountered to reach the Supreme Court. 

Fifty years after the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in favor of SCRAP, To A High Court offers a timely and pertinent look at the U.S. legal system. A decision, and a group, that is still to this day discussed, debated, and taught in law schools throughout the nation. As Proto puts it: “SCRAP still rankles. Fifty years later.”

About the Author:

Neil Thomas Proto’s public service and private practice in law includes forty-five years of experience in land use, environmental, and federal litigation, teaching at Yale University and Georgetown University, and writing and speaking on a broad range of cultural and legal matters.

As a law student at The George Washington University, he chaired Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), which resulted in the first United States Supreme Court decision to consider the National Environmental Policy Act (1973). In the fall of 1973, Mr. Proto joined the United States Department of Justice as an appellate attorney in the Land (now Environment) and Natural Resources Division. He briefed and argued cases involving public lands, Native Americans, and the environment in United States Courts of Appeals. He is the recipient of the Department of Justice Special Commendation Award for Outstanding Service and the Environment and Natural Resources Division Award for Meritorious Service.

During the administration of President Jimmy Carter, Proto served as general counsel to the President's Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee, chaired by future Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt. He was appointed a visiting lecturer at Yale University in 1988 and 1989. In private practice he represented historians, including David McCullough and Doris Kearns Goodwin, in the successful battle against the Disney Theme Park in Virginia, and, on behalf of Native Hawaiians and Hawaii crafted the law that transferred the sacred site of Kaho’olawe Island from the United States to Hawaii. Beginning in 1990, while in private practice in Washington, DC, Proto was an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy. Proto also has authored two other books: The Rights of My People, Liliuokalani’s Enduring Battle with the United States, 1893-1917 (2009), and Fearless: A. Bartlett Giamatti and the Battle for Fairness in America (2019), which was a finalist in Biography for the Next Generation Indie Book Awards and received the Bronze Award in Biography by Foreword Reviews.

Proto is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the United States Supreme Court Bar. He continues to reside in Washington, D.C., occupied by writing, teaching, and exploring new creative threads. His play, The Reckoning, Pecora for the Public was produced in Seattle in 2016. His interests frequently take him abroad, as a Fellow, to Royal Geographical Society conferences and events; to the Pacific Northwest for hiking, sailing, kayaking, and snowshoeing; and to the Northeast to maintain close ties with family members and friends.

It is the fall of 1971. Richard Nixon is in the White House. The nation is still in turmoil over the war in Vietnam. The national dissonance has preoccupied Congress; not only the war but also the...


A Note From the Publisher

The author is available for select interviews and discussions.

The author is available for select interviews and discussions.


Advance Praise

To a High Court is consistently perceptive and a pleasure to read. A large part of the story’s appeal is its setting in the personal lives of SCRAP’s members, Proto examines not only the legal issues in the case and their historical backdrop, but also the everyday context in which SCRAP’s members worked, played, and thought. The law students who pressed this case are real people who worried about law school and the bar exam, tried to manage the distraction of romantic interest and were driven by deeply held philosophical beliefs.” – from “Making Law by Making Trouble” article in The Philadelphia Lawyer by Antoinette R. Stone, Esq.

“We have a remarkable situation here. Five law students…have tied up all the railroads in the country….” --Erwin Griswold, Solicitor General of the United States said to the Supreme Court in his oral argument (February 1973)

“Captures the hopes, fears, slips and slides of big-time environmental litigation. I wish every student of the law could share [such] moments: adversaries spanning the spectrum of trade association lawyers, oblivious agencies, and applause-seeking environmentalists. The professor and students survive the rapids and escape the shoals and claim a sweet environmental win. It may be harder to do it today. But unwarranted optimism has always been behind the better moments of environmental law, and that can never be amended into oblivion or ruled out of order.” – William H. Rodgers, Jr. Stimson Bullitt Professor of Environmental Law, University of Washington School of Law

“As To a High Court shows, Neil Proto obtained his law degree before professors started drumming the narrow ‘injury-causation-redressability’ view of standing-to-sue into the heads of generations of law students. He and the other members of SCRAP were free to imagine and then fight for a broad view of standing. They also convinced the Court’s most traditional ‘strict-constructionist’ – Justice Potter Stewart – that they were right. To a High Court describes, with captivating eloquence and logic, how the imagination and persistence of students can sometimes achieve more than professionals who are restricted by doctrine and imprisoned by caution.” – John Bonine, Professor of Law University of Oregon School of Law

“This high drama of five law students confronting the Railroads’ power and the government’s failure is riveting. The story resonates with questions still central to citizens and legislators: what is the duty of government? And who advocates the public’s interest? ‘Standing to sue’ is critical. When protecting individual rights or requiring corporate responsibility, we must ensure there is judicial review and a citizen’s right to seek it.” – Rosa DeLauro, Member of Congress (Connecticut)

 “I can’t wait for the movie!” --Dan Lauria, actor The Wonder Years

To a High Court is consistently perceptive and a pleasure to read. A large part of the story’s appeal is its setting in the personal lives of SCRAP’s members, Proto examines not only the legal...


Available Editions

EDITION Paperback
ISBN 9781039180482
PRICE $22.99 (USD)
PAGES 348

Available on NetGalley

NetGalley Shelf App (PDF)
Send to Kindle (PDF)
Download (PDF)